Re-Citing Question (17):
" God made Eve from Adam's rib ? Are you ribbing me ? "
It seems to Stephen Miller that the experts of the Bible do not know bow to explain what has been written in the Bible about making Eve from Adam's rib. To emphasize the the point,, Miller refers to the following quotation from the Bible:
" The Lord God took out one of man.s rib and closed up the flesh at that place. Then the Lord God formed a woman from the rib he had taken from the man " "( Genesis 2:21-22 )."
Although attempts were made in order to find an acceptable explanation to ( Genesis 2:21-22 ), none of them really provided a satisfying answer. The following theories have been proposed by some of the experts of the Bible:
Theory One: " It's a pun "
It is a pun-joke, since the word "rib" is taken from a Sumerian language story about a Sumerian god whose name was Enki. It had happened that Enki " had an injured rib. " The story goes on to say that a Sumerian "goddess created a healer called " the lady of the rib, ", or " the lady who makes alive. " What this means is this: It can mean a " rib, " or "to make alive. " Hence, it is considered by some Bible experts as " a pun ", a joke.
Based upon the Sumerian story as outlined in the foregoing, Stephen Miller says that was why the Bible writer talked initially about the " rib " and later on said: " Eve Became the mother of every living person " " ( Genesis 3:20 ). ".
Theory Two: " It's a handful of flesh and bone "
This theory says that "God did not make Eve from just a bone from Adam, but a fistful of flesh and bone. " And this theory relies on what the Adam describes Eve, in the Bible as, " Bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh " " ( Genesis 2:23 ). ".
Theory Three: " It's poetry "
Some Bible scholars wrote the following prose which sounds like poetry, about the creation of Eve
" Eve did not come from Adam's feet to walk on. "
" She did not come from his head to top him. "
" She came from his side to be equal, from under his arm
to enjoy his protection, from near his heart to experience his love. "
Theory Four: " It's history "
Some Christians, and Miller says that " perhaps most, say they read the story as history. They argue that there's no reason not to. "
NO COMMENT. Please reach your own conclusions.